Read the passage carefully and answer the questions given below it. Certain

words/phrases are given in bold to help you locate them while answering some

of the questions

Since 1947, Indians have not spoken out so strongly and clearly for a

completely new brand of people running government. Mercifully, there are no

ministers educated abroad. Thankfully, none of them has been brainwashed at

Harvard, Stanford, Cambridge, the World bank or the IMF, subtly forcing expensive

Western solutions on typically Indian problems at the cost of the poor. Look what

the high powered, foreign returned degree wallahs have reduced this country to.

They wasted opportunities to show the inner strength of what is essentially Indian

because they never really knew their own people living in Bharat. In the eyes of the

World, we have lost our self-respect, dignity and identity.

All the ministers now have gone through average government schools.

Some have never been to college. Many have experienced poverty, exploitation,

injustice and discrimination at some point of time in their lives. It is truly the first

barefoot government ever to be voted into power in independent India. Where else

in the World would you have a one time tea seller on a railway station becoming

Prime Minister, shaping the destiny of more than one billion people?

The first example the Modi government must set is by drastically reducing

the perks and privileges of MPs. Free power, food, housing, travel to those whose

personal assets run into crores and a Rs.2 Crore annual fund for development for

over 500 MPs is costing the exchequer nearly Rs.2000 Crore. Only the Prime

Minister will be able to make it happen and, at the same time, stifle any dissent

from BJP MPs. The time is now.

No other government in the World has a Class 12 pass woman ministers

speaking as an equal to almost 120 heavily qualified, on paper, vice chancellors (90

% male). Today, as we judge them, the VCs are all to intellectually and morally

fatigued. There is something dreadfully wrong with an education system that

produces graduates from even private, expensive, snobbish schools and colleges

who are still prejudiced about caste, class, religion, sex and colour. These“graduates”,

 who roam the streets of small towns and cities by the thousands, call

themselves “educated”, practise the worst forms of cruelty, slavery and crimes

against humanity, against society and in their own families. Indeed, some of them

rose to the level of their incompetence by becoming ministers in previous

governments, reinforcing the status quo, wasting vast public resources by

implementing silly Western ideas, listening to foreign returned “experts” and

making a hopeless mess of this country. The tragedy is that they cannot see the

colossal damage they have done to the very fabric of this country.

121. What is/are true about the ministers of the new government formed

at the Centre?

a) Some of them are ghighly qualified and foreign degree holders.

b) Only a few of them are t he products of average government schools.

c) There are so me ministers who have never been to college.

d) Our Prime Minister is a postgraduate in Political Science.

122. Which of the following is not one of the characteristics of the

ministers of the last government at the Centre?

a) Some of the ministers of the last government at the Centre were educated

abroad.

b) The ministers of the last government were brainwashed at foreign

universities to suggest Western solutions for Indian problems.

c) The Western degree holder ministers coming from the elite class never

knew their own people living in Bharat.

d) Though the ministers of the last government were Western educated yet

they had great concern about the gripping problems of India

123. Which of the following statements is based on the facts mentioned

in the passage?

a) The present government aims at reducing the perks and privileges of

MLAs.

b) There is something wrong with those educational institutions that

produjce graduates who remain prejudiced about caste, class and gender

c) The elitist education policy has still managed to make students humble

and sensitive towards humanity.

d) None of the present ministers has gone through poverty, injustice,

exploitation and discrimination

124. What is the perception about India in the eyes of the World?

a) That India is a developing nation

b) That we don’t have self respect, dignity and identity

c) That India is still a c ountry of snake charmers

d) That India is an educationally backward nation

125. Choose the word/group of words which is most similar in meaning

to the word/group of words printed in bold as used in the passage.

Destiny

a) Objective b) Prospect c) Future

d) Concept

126. Choose the word/group of words which is most similar in meaning

to the word/group of words printed in bold as used in the passage.

Perks

a) Benefits b) Candy c) Loss

d) Constraints

127. Choose the word/group of words which is most similar in meaning

to the word/group of words printed in bold as used in the passage.

Fatigued

a) Fresh b) Lively c) Exhausted

d) Vivacious

128. Choose the word/group of words which is most opposite in

meaning of the word/group of words printed in bold as used in the passage.

Dissent

a) Strife b) Marvellous c) Objections

d) Approval

129. Choose the word/group of words which is most opposite in

meaning of the word/group of words printed in bold as used in the passage.

Snobbish

a) Haughty b) Pompous c) Arrogant

d) Humble

A BRIEF CONCEPT OF INEQUALITY AND SHORT TRICKS ALSO:

Hello floks.now i going to share a short story or u can said it as trick also..

in mumbai..there have a community..and there two family leaving opposite each other..in between their house separate by a divider..

• 1st family member are >,>= 
  
  
  • say as above divider is- = (servant of two families)

• 2 nd family member are <, <=

family members of 1st was rival to 2nd family member and vice-versa.so they were not enter to each other house.

satellite picture same as         >          >=

                                          ----- = -----
                                           <          <=

----->but twist of the story, "=" was common servant of their home.(kuch type ka lok hya jo iska ghar jalanwali news uska rival k ghar me lagata hya,or uska ghar ka news opposite waalo k ghar me laga te hya) so he or she could go two house easily.

------>again a twist,1st house ">"gender is male and >= gender is female(ghar me economical dik hamra papa hi dek vaal karta hya..iska koi dusre meaning or ladies ego pe heart karne ka khoyaish nehi hya..jis ka mn jo chahe le lo.papa or mamma)so ">" > ">="

same to same at 2nd family

now a example-

statement: A>B>C<=D=F<J>K>=L

conclusion:1.J>=L

2.B>F

3.J>D

4.A>K

5.D>A

ANSWER WITH DESCRIPTION---->1.false.in between J and L there have two sign > and >= according to story ">" > ">=" so it contradict with conclusion.

2.false.according to story when we go forward B to F there >and<= present,who are rival to each other.so it not follow.

3.true.there have only two sign = and < so their have no problem each other.

4.false.because there have rival sign present..so it not follow.when we go forward A to k.

5.false.because when we go forward from D to A there >,>,<= sign present which show contradiction.

now a special type example:

statement:T>I>O<=K<L>E=F<W

conclusion:1.T>=k

2.L>W

3.K<T

4.w>L

5.I<T

ANSWER WITH EXPLANATION:1.FALSE.rival sign are present betweenT and K

2.FALSE.rival are present.

3.FALSE.rival sign are present between T and K.

4.FALSE.rival present.

5.TRUE.when we go forward from I to T we see T>I.so I<T.

------> but twist,between 1 are 3 either 1 follow or 3 follow.

trick:1.if subject and predicate are same.(in 1 and 3 T and K are same)

2.both conclusion should be wrong.

3.there sign have to present(>,<,=)

the conclusion obviously go for either or...

Thats all..a small trying to simply the inequality problem..study together rise together!!!!:)

 REASONING QUIZ :-
Directions: In each question below are given two
statements followed by two conclusions numbered I
and II. You have take the two given statements to be
true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly
known facts. Read the conclusions and then decide
which of the given conclusions logically follows from
the given statements disregarding commonly known
facts.
Give answer
1) If only conclusion I follows.
2) if only conclusion II follows.
3) if either I or II follows.
4) if neither I nor II follows.
5) if both I and II follow.

1. Statements: All leaders are good team workers.
                      All good team workers are good orators.
Conclusions: I. Some good team workers are leaders.
                   II. All good orators are leaders.
2. Statements: All terrorists are human.
                      All humans are bad.
Conclusions: I. All terrorists are bad.
                   II. No human can be a terrorist.
3. Statements:Some teacher are follower
                     Some follower are famous.
Conclusions: I.Some teachers are famous.
                    II. some followers are famous.
4.Statements: Ship was overturned.
                     captain was not traced.
Conclusions: I.captain died in accident.
                    II.captain is alive.
5.Statements:some dedicate souls are angels.
                    all social workers are angels.
 Conclusions:I.some dedicated souls are social workers.
                   II.some social workers are dedicated souls.

THANK YOU..
  

answer
1.1
2.1
3.2
4.4
5.4